<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David Lano &#187; Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidlano.com/category/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidlano.com</link>
	<description>Riffs on Business, Marketing, Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>The Courtesy of &#8220;No Thank You&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/06/17/the-courtesy-of-no-thank-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/06/17/the-courtesy-of-no-thank-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no thank you]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We try to teach our kids good manners. One thing we teach them to say is &#8220;no, thank you&#8221;. It&#8217;s not a big deal to say &#8220;no, thank you&#8221; and move on. So, when between childhood and adulthood did people forget how to say &#8220;no, thank you&#8221;? We’ve all been there before. Somebody offers you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 7px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2009%2F06%2F17%2Fthe-courtesy-of-no-thank-you%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2009%2F06%2F17%2Fthe-courtesy-of-no-thank-you%2F&amp;source=davidlano&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div class="left_image_chunk">
<span><img src="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/no-thank-you.jpg" style="margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 3px;" align="left" title="No Thank You" /></span>We try to teach our kids good manners.  One thing we teach them to say is &#8220;no, thank you&#8221;.  It&#8217;s not a big deal to say &#8220;no, thank you&#8221; and move on.  So, when between childhood and adulthood did people forget how to say &#8220;no, thank you&#8221;?</p>
<p>We’ve all been there before. Somebody offers you something, it could be anything &#8211; an invite to a party, a business proposal, heck even a stick of gum. We usually respond with a &#8220;yes&#8221;, a &#8220;maybe&#8221;, some silence, or sometimes a &#8220;no, thank you&#8221;.  Lately I’ve been surprised at how many times I offer something to someone and simply never hear from them again.  I realize people don’t have to fall in love with everything I do or offer&#8230;but seriously?  No response?</p>
<h3>A Few Examples</h3>
<p>A friend of a friend asked me to help him out with developing a new website for his business.  I told him I&#8217;d put together a price quote and send him an e-mail. Two weeks went by &#8211; no answer. Was my price too high?  Did he find someone else?  Was he simply not interested anymore?  Who knows.  I never heard back&#8230;</p>
<p>I listed my Dad&#8217;s <a href="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/audi-a4-quattro-for-sale/">Audi A4 for sale</a> a few weeks ago and received a call from a local girl.  She was driving by my office downtown, saw that the car was for sale, gave me a call, and went out for a test drive.  She said her dad would be off work in a couple hours and she would pay cash.  A few hours went by, no call.  I left a voicemail and never heard from her again&#8230;</p>
<h3>Our Response</h3>
<p>I come by instances like these all the time where I get no response so I assume the answer is &#8220;no&#8221;.  It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m frustrated with their decision of declining my offer, it&#8217;s the method.  Sure, we all like to hear a &#8220;Yes&#8221;, but even a &#8220;No&#8221;, or better yet, a &#8220;No, Thank You&#8221; is better than silence.  I&#8217;m just interested in having closure.  If I&#8217;m honest with myself, I know I do this too.  I either change the subject after a question I don&#8217;t want to say no to, or just never answer, hoping they get the gist.</p>
<p>I realize it&#8217;s often hard to say &#8220;no&#8221; but I think we need to get back in the habit of saying &#8220;no, thank you&#8221; when we simply don’t want something or want to do something.  I think people have got into a bad habit of letting the silence say &#8220;no&#8221; for them and it’s a cop-out.</p>
<p>Of course we can&#8217;t always say &#8220;yes&#8221;, but we do have a choice in how we communicate our response &#8211; staying silent isn’t an option.</p>
<p>Saying &#8220;No, Thank You&#8221; is a courtesy we can&#8217;t afford to ignore.
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/06/17/the-courtesy-of-no-thank-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drinking from a fire hydrant</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/12/16/drinking-from-a-fire-hydrant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/12/16/drinking-from-a-fire-hydrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire hydrant water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader starred items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You probably noticed my previous post, signaling my big Ooops. If you have no idea what I&#8217;m talking about then you&#8217;re for the better, but in case you weren&#8217;t so lucky, I apologize for the confusion. Ok, but nobody want&#8217;s to hear about my screw ups&#8230;so let&#8217;s get to the good stuff: We all have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 7px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F12%2F16%2Fdrinking-from-a-fire-hydrant%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F12%2F16%2Fdrinking-from-a-fire-hydrant%2F&amp;source=davidlano&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div class="left_image_chunk">
<span><img src="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/fire-hydrant-water.jpg" style="margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 3px;" align="left" title="Drinking from a fire hydrant" width="300" /></span>You probably noticed my previous <a href="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/12/16/ooops/">post</a>, signaling my big Ooops.  If you have no idea what I&#8217;m talking about then you&#8217;re for the better, but in case you weren&#8217;t so lucky, I apologize for the confusion.</p>
<p>Ok, but nobody want&#8217;s to hear about my screw ups&#8230;so let&#8217;s get to the good stuff:</p>
<p>We all have limited time, and most of us have <i>some</i> difficulty keeping up with the overwhelming amount of information out there on the web.  It&#8217;s like trying to drink water from a fire hydrant &#8211; not easy.  Most of the information is useless, some helpful, and only a sliver is actually worthwhile.</p>
<p>Well, I happen to spend a fair amount of time sifting through my 150ish blogs or so in my Google Reader and thought you all might like to see what I think is considered &#8216;worthwhile&#8217;.  I call them my Starred Posts.</p>
<p>I only &#8216;Star&#8217; the posts that I consider to be truly excellent.  I would say it&#8217;s a 1/250 ratio or so.  Out of 250 blog posts I read, 1 is worthwhile.  Now, this isn&#8217;t to say that 249 of the 250 posts are useless, but this helps me manage the impossible.</p>
<p>I was trying to integrate an <a href="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/what-is-rss">RSS</a> feed into this blog in a somewhat intuitive way, but failed miserably.  So, unless someone has some brilliant idea of how to custom configure Google Reader&#8217;s starred items feed into an HTML page including title links and details, I&#8217;ll stick with the default starred items public page.</p>
<p>Basically, if you want to see what I think is a must read, take a look at my <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/user/14087175221950042607/state/com.google/starred">starred posts page</a>.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/12/16/drinking-from-a-fire-hydrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vertical Challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/11/23/vertical-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/11/23/vertical-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drip drip drop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[struggle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the dip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vertical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having a Drip, Drip, Drop mentality isn&#8217;t always easy. Especially when crawling up, what seems to be, an impossible hill to climb. Most never start, some begin but give up, and few make it. It&#8217;s difficult, no doubt about it, but the reward is magnificent. Seth Godin&#8217;s written about The Dip before, and I think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 7px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F11%2F23%2Fvertical-challenge%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F11%2F23%2Fvertical-challenge%2F&amp;source=davidlano&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div class="left_image_chunk">
<span><img src="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/hill.jpg" style="margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 3px;" align="left" title="Steep Hill" /></span>Having a <a href="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/11/09/fans-followers-drip-drip-drip/">Drip, Drip, Drop</a> mentality isn&#8217;t always easy.  Especially when crawling up, what seems to be, an impossible hill to climb.</p>
<p>Most never start, some begin but give up, and few make it.  It&#8217;s difficult, no doubt about it, but the reward is magnificent.</p>
<p>Seth Godin&#8217;s written about <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/the_dip/">The Dip</a> before, and I think it&#8217;s a great way to look at life&#8217;s adventures.  However, I want to focus on the slant that faces so many of us soon after we start something new.  This steep hill, or (apparent) &#8220;brick wall&#8221;, usually surfaces when we experience difficulties such as: we hit a learning curve, things start falling apart, we encounter road blocks, etc, etc.  We all know what it looks like, but how do we become that 1% that takes a deep breath, and runs up the hill as fast as we can?  Determination, perseverance, resiliency?  Yeah, sure&#8230;these are all necessary but I would argue that passion is the driving force behind these qualities.</p>
<h2>Why is the hill so steep!</h2>
<p>Of course, the hill is steep for a reason.  It exists, simply to discourage the masses.  And give, a select few, the opportunity to be great.  Mediocre won&#8217;t cut it.  Being average won&#8217;t do.  In fact, good isn&#8217;t good enough.  The only way to make it to the top of the hill is to struggle.  Yes, struggle.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not talking about running a 10k, I&#8217;m talking about finishing well in the New York Marathon.  Of course, we all live in our own little worlds.  I have what I consider to be an impossible climb.  You have what you consider to be an impossible climb.  Each hill is unique for that individual&#8230;but what we do with that hill is what matters.  It&#8217;s a choice really.  Will you settle for being average?  I struggle with this each and every day&#8230;but it&#8217;s a struggle I don&#8217;t think we can pass up.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/11/23/vertical-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fans, Followers &amp; The Drip, Drip, Drop</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/11/09/fans-followers-drip-drip-drip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/11/09/fans-followers-drip-drip-drip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drip drip drip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drip drip drop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[followers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s face it, we all get a little frustrated and disappointed when people don&#8217;t notice or embrace what we&#8217;ve written, created, or talked about. Whether it be your own blog, product, or presentation, people may not care and trust may not have been built yet. I&#8217;ve talked about wanting attention before and how it can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 7px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F11%2F09%2Ffans-followers-drip-drip-drip%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F11%2F09%2Ffans-followers-drip-drip-drip%2F&amp;source=davidlano&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div class="left_image_chunk"><span><img style="margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 3px;" title="Drip Drip Drop" src="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/drip-drip.jpg" alt="" align="left" /></span>Let&#8217;s face it, we all get a little frustrated and disappointed when people don&#8217;t notice or embrace what we&#8217;ve written, created, or talked about.  Whether it be your own blog, product, or presentation, people may not care and trust may not have been built yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve talked about <a href="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/01/28/the-deception-of-the-masses-wanting-lots-of-attention/">wanting attention</a> before and how it can be a slippery slope, but on the other hand we also need others to notice and interact with what we&#8217;ve done, before they become fans or followers.</p>
<p>So, how do we build trust?  Do we bombard them with information and overwhelm them with enthusiasm?  Trick them?  Deceive them?  No.  It&#8217;s all about the Drip, Drip, Drop &#8211; that steady stream of value, accumulated overtime, until finally, unexpectedly they become a fan.  A true follower, once a skeptic now a believer.  Which drip was responsible for convincing them to cross over?  No one knows.  But each drip, as small and as minuscule as it may seem was part of the flood that they now trust and respect.</p>
<p>The Drip, Drip, Drop requires patience, perseverance, and dedication.  You can’t just expect people to latch on and become die hard fans over night.  It takes time, commitment and most people give up just before it starts paying off.  Seth Godin talks about <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/04/drip-drip-drip.html">&#8220;Drip, drip, drip goes the Twit&#8221;</a> and how it can help you build a strong foundation for something you want to launch in the future.  I think it&#8217;s a great idea, and that&#8217;s partially why <a href="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/10/28/david-on-twitter/">I joined Twitter</a>.</p>
<p>One thing we have to remember though is the Drip has to be something great.  Nobody wants to read a mediocre blog post, use a worthless product, or listen to a boring presentation.  Every single drip must be excellent.  After all, a potential fan may just see one drip.  That&#8217;s it.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/11/09/fans-followers-drip-drip-drip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red, For A Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/04/27/red-for-a-reason/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/04/27/red-for-a-reason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red for a reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever someone pours time and energy into a business, blog, product, project, etc their is a chance something will go &#8216;Red&#8217;. &#8216;Red&#8217;, meaning something is broken. It could be a new marketing strategy you just implemented, an investment you just purchased, or a business&#8217; finances operating in the negative. Ideas turn sour, things go wrong [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 7px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F04%2F27%2Fred-for-a-reason%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F04%2F27%2Fred-for-a-reason%2F&amp;source=davidlano&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div class="left_image_chunk"><span><img src="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/red_reason.jpg" style="margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 3px;" align="left" /></span>Whenever someone pours time and energy into a business, blog, product, project, etc their is a chance something will go &#8216;Red&#8217;.  &#8216;Red&#8217;, meaning something is broken.  </p>
<p>It could be a new marketing strategy you just implemented, an investment you just purchased, or a business&#8217; finances operating in the negative.  Ideas turn sour, things go wrong and you&#8217;re left with a mess.</p>
<p>The tendency for most, is to simply blame it on some external factor: economy, customers, oil prices, competitors, you name it.  Or, just simply throw up there hands in frustration and give up.</p>
<p>Of course one of the most obvious reasons for not wanting to label something as Red, is nobody likes to admit they screwed up.  But, as we all know, settling for something that is Red or mediocre at best is no way to be successful.  After all, recognition of failure is a vital component in growth.</p>
<div class="left_image_chunk">
<h2>It&#8217;s <span class="red">Red</span> for a reason</h2>
<p>The concept of Red can apply to just about anything:</p>
<ul>
<li>Projects fail</li>
<li>Marketing strategy flops</li>
<li>Demand for a new product is non-existent</li>
<li>65% on a test</li>
<li>Relationships damaged.</li>
<li>Low traffic to your blog or website</li>
<li>Spam</li>
<li>Being overweight</li>
<li>Etc&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p>Of course, making the Red go away isn&#8217;t always easy.  In fact, sometimes it can be quite costly; perhaps ones reputation, career, or life.  However, recognizing that it exists and does so for a reason, is the first step in finding a solution to the problem.</p>
<p>I realize this isn&#8217;t anything new, but for some reason I felt compelled to put it in writing.  It&#8217;s just too easy to pass things by that are broken and label them as orange (semi-broken) or yellow (good enough) at best, and convince ourselves that all is well.  For me, knowing that something is Red, for a  reason, emphasizes its brokenness and shows me the need to fix it.</p>
<p>What do you see as being Red in the Blogosphere, Business, Marketing?  Is it Red for a reason?
</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/04/27/red-for-a-reason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gift Economy, And Why It&#8217;s Refreshing</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/03/29/the-gift-economy-and-why-its-refreshing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/03/29/the-gift-economy-and-why-its-refreshing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gift economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/03/29/the-gift-economy-and-why-its-refreshing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Business, Marketing, Blogging &#8211; it all seems so forced sometimes. The push/pull mentality that often surrounds these services is what ends up being corrosive. Why is it that we tend to look for the benefit of the transaction, instead of the joy in making a contribution? I&#8217;ve talked about attention and the effect it can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 7px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F03%2F29%2Fthe-gift-economy-and-why-its-refreshing%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F03%2F29%2Fthe-gift-economy-and-why-its-refreshing%2F&amp;source=davidlano&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div class="left_image_chunk">
<span><img src="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/hands2a.jpg" style="margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 3px;" align="left" /></span>Business, Marketing, Blogging &#8211; it all seems so forced sometimes.  The push/pull mentality that often surrounds these services is what ends up being corrosive.  Why is it that <i>we</i> tend to look for the benefit of the transaction, instead of the joy in making a contribution?  I&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/01/28/the-deception-of-the-masses-wanting-lots-of-attention/">talked about attention</a> and the effect it can have on economics.  But is attention what we really ought to be seeking after?  What is the benefit for the one giving the attention?  Is there a benefit?</p>
<p>Most would say it&#8217;s our instinct to look out for ourselves first, make sure we are taken care of, receive something for our efforts.  But do we actually gain anything by forcing others to listen to us?  Would the intention of serving others perhaps fulfill the original desire of &#8216;receiving&#8217; something for our efforts?  There is a lot of concern as to whether the US market economy is unstable and tipsy at best, but what about the Gift Economy?  Granted, the market economy <i>is</i> important and <i>does</i> have a close tie with our lifestyle, career, and security but where does the Gift Economy come into play?  Does it matter?</p>
<p>The Gift Economy holds together the most vital characteristic of society &#8211; Love.  Without love everything else falls apart.  The market economy could be at its peak, but without the steady heartbeat of the Gift Economy, money holds no value, trust doesn&#8217;t exist, security is worthless, and freedom is useless.</p>
<p>What would happen if we took a different approach?  What if we changed our strategy?  What if we cared more about the customer than ourselves?  What if we truly wanted to serve instead of take?  Would we be setting ourselves up entirely, at the mercy of those &#8220;devouring&#8221; our precious gifts?  Yes, probably.  But who would win?  For me, it all comes down to what constitutes winning.  When the dust settles, what prize matters most?  Is it money, popularity, knowledge, power?  All of these are natural acquisitions when participating in the Gift Economy, but no that&#8217;s not really what I care about.  I care about loving others well.  And the only way to successfully accomplish this is to be part of the Gift Economy.</p>
<p>Are you participating in the Gift Economy?  What are your thoughts on the Gift Economy and its effect on Business, Marketing, Blogging, etc?</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/03/29/the-gift-economy-and-why-its-refreshing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Productivity: Simply in Focus</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/02/27/productivity-simply-in-focus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/02/27/productivity-simply-in-focus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-tasking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[put things off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slash lifestyle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/02/27/productivity-simply-in-focus/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found an article over at Write to Done called &#8220;Write Just One Thing Today, and Write It Well&#8221;. It really hit home with me, not just with writing but with doing anything. Here&#8217;s the theory: Focusing on one particular thing, minimizes distraction and directs attention, allowing one to pour all of their energy into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 7px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F02%2F27%2Fproductivity-simply-in-focus%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F02%2F27%2Fproductivity-simply-in-focus%2F&amp;source=davidlano&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div class="left_image_chunk">
<span class="title_image"><img src="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/1810357551_bd5a27da50.jpg" align="left" /></span>I found an article over at <a href="http://writetodone.com/">Write to Done</a> called <a href="http://writetodone.com/2008/02/26/write-just-one-thing-today-and-write-it-well/">&#8220;Write Just One Thing Today, and Write It Well&#8221;</a>.  It really hit home with me, not just with writing but with doing anything.</p>
<p><b>Here&#8217;s the theory:</b> Focusing on one particular thing, minimizes distraction and directs attention, allowing one to pour all of their energy into the completion of a task.  All of the non-important stuff fades into the background, stress vanishes, mind is clear, and simplicity arrives.</p>
<p>This is great and all, but is it practical?  Especially when juggling several things at once?</div>
<div style="clear: both;"><i>Image Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/margolove/1810357551/">margolove</a></i></p>
<p></p>
<h2>Being a &#8216;slash&#8217; &#038; Doing Things Well</h2>
<p>I recently wrote an <a href="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/02/06/the-4-hour-workweek-the-slash-lifestyle/">article</a> on living a &#8216;slash&#8217; lifestyle.  I am a huge fan on being a &#8216;slash&#8217;, but does this keep someone from being productive?  Do we compromise our ability to do something well by spreading ourselves out too thin?  I think we need to take a good look at what the real issue is here.  Is time the issue, or is it a lack of focus?</p>
<h2>Lack of Time or Not Enough Focus?</h2>
<p><b>It <i>seems</i> as though there isn&#8217;t enough time in the day to accomplish what needs to get done.<br />I have a feeling this is just a result of having a lack of focus.</b><br />Let me explain&#8230;</p>
<p>When I am focusing on one particular project or task, directing my attention specifically towards its completion, everything else fades away.  You&#8217;ve probably heard the phrase: &#8220;Being In the Zone&#8221;.</p>
<h2>Multi-Tasking</h2>
<p>In today&#8217;s day and age, we have become experts at multitasking.  You&#8217;ve probably seen someone driving down the interstate, talking on their cell, selecting the next track to play on their iPod, and eating Chinese &#8211; multi-tasking.</p>
<p>Granted, sometimes multi-tasking is necessary, but do we <i>really</i> need to be hyper conscious of our &#8216;optimal performance&#8217; 24/7?  I don&#8217;t think so.  In fact, I think it hinders our productivity.</p>
<h2>Put Things Off</h2>
<p>Nick has written an excellent <a href="http://putthingsoff.com/index.php/productivity-is-dead/">article</a> over at <a href="http://putthingsoff.com/">Put Things Off</a>, where he talks about how the &#8220;&#8216;Productivity&#8217; craze is out of control&#8221;.  I totally agree with him.  I think there is too much emphasis in being hyper efficient, and not enough on being effective.  There are a lot of really efficient people out there running around in circles, not really accomplishing their goals.</p>
<p>Are you an expert hyper multi-tasker?  Do you get more done when you focus on one particular thing or when you hyper multi-task?  What is your experience?</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/02/27/productivity-simply-in-focus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 4-Hour Workweek &amp; The &#8216;Slash&#8217; Lifestyle</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/02/06/the-4-hour-workweek-the-slash-lifestyle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/02/06/the-4-hour-workweek-the-slash-lifestyle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marci alboher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the four hour workweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim ferriss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timothy ferriss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/02/06/the-4-hour-workweek-the-slash-lifestyle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been reading the The 4-Hour Workweek by Tim Ferriss and just finished watching this video, where Tim and Marci Alboher talk about their latest books with Google employees. I haven&#8217;t read Marci&#8217;s book One Person/Multiple Careers yet, but am really interested in her perspective on simultaneous interests. I am especially intrigued by her [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 7px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F02%2F06%2Fthe-4-hour-workweek-the-slash-lifestyle%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F02%2F06%2Fthe-4-hour-workweek-the-slash-lifestyle%2F&amp;source=davidlano&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I have been reading the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2F4-Hour-Workweek-Escape-Live-Anywhere%2Fdp%2F0307353133%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1202313899%26sr%3D1-1&#038;tag=davidlcom-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">The 4-Hour Workweek</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=davidlcom-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> by <a href="http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/">Tim Ferriss</a> and just finished watching this video, where Tim and <a href="http://marcialboher.blogspot.com/">Marci Alboher</a> talk about their latest books with Google employees.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UcqcWVZJPb0&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UcqcWVZJPb0&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read Marci&#8217;s book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FOne-Person-Multiple-Careers-Success%2Fdp%2F0446696978%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1202313515%26sr%3D1-1&#038;tag=davidlcom-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">One Person/Multiple Careers</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=davidlcom-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> yet, but am really interested in her perspective on simultaneous interests. I am especially intrigued by her newly coined word <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/slashcareers">&#8216;slash&#8217;</a> and its impact on an individual&#8217;s lifestyle.</p>
<p>Being an entrepreneur and someone that becomes obsessively passionate about one thing after the other, I would consider myself to be a &#8216;slash&#8217;, often saying I enjoy business/marketing/web development/design/photography/reading/biking/etc.</p>
<h2>So, is being a &#8216;Slash&#8217; a good thing or a bad thing?</h2>
<p>Well, I think it depends&#8230;</p>
<h4>Being A Non-Slash:</h4>
<p>Being a non-slash keeps you from spreading too thin and allows you to direct your main focus and attention on one primary interest.  This is how specialization came about.  Specialization can be good, <i>if </i> the specialist is actually passionate about what they do.  But what if they aren&#8217;t?  What if it&#8217;s just part of going with the flow?  Not Good.  This is why you see people that are really good at what they do but hate it.  IMHO specialization puts people in a box.  Being a specialist creates an imaginary safe haven, providing a comfortable mold that they can settle into, becoming resistant to growth.</p>
<h4>Being A &#8216;Slash&#8217;:</h4>
<p>Being a &#8216;slash&#8217;, allows you to be creative and gives you several outlets for pursuing your passions.  This removes any possibility of becoming bored or feeling stuck in a rut.  Their is a possibility of becoming spread too thin, but after a while familiar interests can be set to auto pilot and you can redirect your focus accordingly.  I think one of the most obvious benefits of being a &#8216;slash&#8217;, is the ability to have constant growth and joy in pursuing new passions.  <b>Passion</b> is the key term here.  The &#8216;slash&#8217; mentality opens up a whole new world of opportunities and adventure for you to explore.</p>
<h2>But I don&#8217;t have enough time to pursue all of my passions?</h2>
<p>This is where <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2F4-Hour-Workweek-Escape-Live-Anywhere%2Fdp%2F0307353133%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1202313899%26sr%3D1-1&#038;tag=davidlcom-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">The 4-Hour Workweek</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=davidlcom-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> and Tim&#8217;s technique&#8217;s come into play.  What really fascinates me about combining Tim&#8217;s technique&#8217;s and the &#8216;slash&#8217; lifestyle, is you can have total freedom to experience the things you are most passionate about.</p>
<h2>Are You A &#8216;Slash&#8217;?</h2>
<p>Are you a &#8216;slash&#8217;?  If not, why?  What&#8217;s holding you back?  If so, how do you find time to pursue all of your passions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/02/06/the-4-hour-workweek-the-slash-lifestyle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remote Desktop &#8211; LogMeIn</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/02/06/remote-desktop-logmein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/02/06/remote-desktop-logmein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ToolBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access and control computer remotely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logmein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote desktop logmein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/02/06/remote-desktop-logmein/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been using LogMeIn for quite a while now. Basically it allows me to access and control any of my computers from a remote location. Sure comes in handy when you are away on vacation and forgot to email that document you had been working on. Or, want to show your friends some of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 7px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F02%2F06%2Fremote-desktop-logmein%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F02%2F06%2Fremote-desktop-logmein%2F&amp;source=davidlano&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="https://secure.logmein.com/welcome/get_logmein_free/signup.asp"><img src="http://www.davidlano.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/logmein_logo.jpg" border="0" alt="logmein" /></a></p>
<p>I have been using <a href="https://secure.logmein.com/welcome/get_logmein_free/signup.asp">LogMeIn</a> for quite a while now.  Basically it allows me to access and control any of my computers from a remote location.</p>
<p>Sure comes in handy when you are away on vacation and forgot to email that document you had been working on.  Or, want to show your friends some of your latest photos but haven&#8217;t uploaded them to Flickr yet.</p>
<p>LogMeIn is totally free and easy to use.  Can be used for personal or business purposes.  Nothing revolutionary but can be very convenient.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/02/06/remote-desktop-logmein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Deception of the Masses &amp; Wanting Lots of Attention</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/01/28/the-deception-of-the-masses-wanting-lots-of-attention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/01/28/the-deception-of-the-masses-wanting-lots-of-attention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception of blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stumble upon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/2008/01/28/the-deception-of-the-masses-wanting-lots-of-attention/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a relatively new needle in the blogosphere haystack, I often find myself up against a tremendous amount of pressure to publish something appealing to the masses. It seems as though the &#8220;best&#8221; way to stand out and receive attention/traffic is by creating provocative content, mastering SEO, and flooding social networking sites like Digg and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 7px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F01%2F28%2Fthe-deception-of-the-masses-wanting-lots-of-attention%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidlano.com%2F2008%2F01%2F28%2Fthe-deception-of-the-masses-wanting-lots-of-attention%2F&amp;source=davidlano&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Being a relatively new needle in the blogosphere haystack, I often find myself up against a tremendous amount of pressure to publish something appealing to the masses.  It <i>seems</i> as though the &#8220;best&#8221; way to stand out and receive attention/traffic is by creating provocative content, mastering <acronym title="Search Engine Optimization">SEO</acronym>, and flooding social networking sites like <a href="http://digg.com/">Digg</a> and <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/">StumbleUpon</a> with propaganda.  There are <b>way</b> to many posts IMHO that encourage this behavior.  For example, how many times have you run across a post saying something like this: &#8220;How I made it to the front page of Digg&#8221;, or &#8220;10 effective link building techniques&#8221;.  Attention grabbers?  You bet, wouldn&#8217;t it be great if we could all just get the attention we deserve?  But do we <i>really</i> deserve the attention?</p>
<p>When we put too much emphasis on these tools and strategies, we are not only assuming we deserve the attention of the masses but we are ignoring the power of the individual.  The power to choose, the power to engage, and the power to influence others.</p>
<p>By creating and promoting content for the mass phenomena, we&#8217;re becoming more and more invisible to our primary readers.  The fact of the matter is, not everyone is part of the &#8220;masses&#8221; category.  Seth does an excellent job of explaining this <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/01/who-are-these-p.html">here</a>.</p>
<p>Attention and more importantly, interaction with your audience, isn&#8217;t established by making it to the front page of Digg or blending in with the masses.  Building a permission based asset and developing a respect among your readers is a much more effective way of establishing a long-term conversation.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we can, or should, totally ignore the advantages of using tools like social networks or link building techniques, but unless we have something of value to offer our readers, the traffic/attention goes to waste and the reader is left with an empty and false perception of what we have to offer.  I think we need to reevaluate what our primary focus should be as publishers.  Is it our goal to entice readers grouped in the &#8220;masses&#8221; category in order to receive lots of attention?  Or should we be concentrated and focused on starting a conversation, with an individual, exchanging value and developing a relationship?</p>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlano.com/2008/01/28/the-deception-of-the-masses-wanting-lots-of-attention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

