What about the Internet?

I’ve had a few people compare TV with the Internet. Saying something like, “The Internet is a waist of time…” etc. etc. I, of course, defended the Internet to the core…but wait. Is there a similarity? The Internet of course is more interactive. And, depending on how many channels you have, both TV and Internet offer several choices. But, really when it comes down to it, what are the real differences?

I would argue that TV is a one way communicator (One Lane) and the Internet is a two way communicator (Two Lanes). TV only provides value (Sometimes) to you; while the Internet gives you value (Sometimes), but you also have the option of providing value back (Lane Two).

Ok, so what? Well, I see the two way communication as a HUGE advantage. The Internet isn’t a dead end. You have the ability to provide value to others, not just soak up what’s coming your way.

Of course, it all depends on what you’re doing on the Internet. Just because the Internet can be interactive doesn’t mean it will. I of course could watch TV shows on the Internet all day long, and that wouldn’t make it any better than watching TV. The Internet is a gateway. An opportunity to participate and provide value to others. But, of course you choose whether or not you take advantage of lane two.

Ok, sweet so I can spend all my time on the Internet?

No. I’m not implying that we should all live on the Internet. I do think the Internet is better than TV, but the Internet is a pitiful substitute for real life. The Internet, just like most anything else, should be used with moderation.

So, what’s your take on TV and the Internet? Do you think one is better than the other? Do you hate me now?