<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search: Google vs. Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/</link>
	<description>Riffs on Business, Marketing, Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Primary Work at Home</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-14258</link>
		<dc:creator>Primary Work at Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=348#comment-14258</guid>
		<description>I like the twitter search too, it is easy to search the interested topics in twitter but of course I like Google search because it has info about everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the twitter search too, it is easy to search the interested topics in twitter but of course I like Google search because it has info about everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design Web Development Company</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6003</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design Web Development Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=348#comment-6003</guid>
		<description>Great Comparison. But Google is the ULTIMATE. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Comparison. But Google is the ULTIMATE. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-5997</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=348#comment-5997</guid>
		<description>Interesting comparison.  I&#039;ve recently found myself using Twitter for searches more lately, although certain search terms tend to yield a lot of spam.  Thanks for the info on the Firefox script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comparison.  I&#8217;ve recently found myself using Twitter for searches more lately, although certain search terms tend to yield a lot of spam.  Thanks for the info on the Firefox script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-5836</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=348#comment-5836</guid>
		<description>Twitter would obviously be a better place to search what people are talking about on Twitter.  But all you to do is change the question just a little bit and twitter search becomes mostly no help.  &quot;What are people saying about 24 on IMDB?&quot;

Most searches on google are not &quot;what are people saying&quot;?  Lets try &quot;What&#039;s the price of Tea in China?&quot;

The twitter search gives me one person saying it 2 dollars US for 25 bags.  What level of confidence should I put in that one post?

Searching google I found a range of answers including links to places I could buy said tea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter would obviously be a better place to search what people are talking about on Twitter.  But all you to do is change the question just a little bit and twitter search becomes mostly no help.  &#8220;What are people saying about 24 on IMDB?&#8221;</p>
<p>Most searches on google are not &#8220;what are people saying&#8221;?  Lets try &#8220;What&#8217;s the price of Tea in China?&#8221;</p>
<p>The twitter search gives me one person saying it 2 dollars US for 25 bags.  What level of confidence should I put in that one post?</p>
<p>Searching google I found a range of answers including links to places I could buy said tea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-5828</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=348#comment-5828</guid>
		<description>I liked your analogy. Showing how to effectively use Twitter for searches vs Google. I&#039;m new to Twitter and found this helpful. and yes I&#039;m a little slow being I just started tweeting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked your analogy. Showing how to effectively use Twitter for searches vs Google. I&#8217;m new to Twitter and found this helpful. and yes I&#8217;m a little slow being I just started tweeting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-5827</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=348#comment-5827</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only recently started searching through Twitter, and it&#039;s been a good way to find new people to follow, answers to questions &amp; questions to answer.

TwitterSearch sounds good, and as an avid Firefox fan, I&#039;ll definitely be looking into the addon you mentioned. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only recently started searching through Twitter, and it&#8217;s been a good way to find new people to follow, answers to questions &amp; questions to answer.</p>
<p>TwitterSearch sounds good, and as an avid Firefox fan, I&#8217;ll definitely be looking into the addon you mentioned. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-5736</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=348#comment-5736</guid>
		<description>Twitter Search still has a long way to go before being anywhere near as useful as Google&#039;s search (not that Google&#039;s search is near perfect either). Twitter Search doesn&#039;t have any means of sorting or valuating its results save for one: recent-ness. 

You can get a little better filtering via Advanced Search (I will admit the Attitude Quantity is intriguing), but a) who wants to do that, and b) there&#039;s still no ranking of results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter Search still has a long way to go before being anywhere near as useful as Google&#8217;s search (not that Google&#8217;s search is near perfect either). Twitter Search doesn&#8217;t have any means of sorting or valuating its results save for one: recent-ness. </p>
<p>You can get a little better filtering via Advanced Search (I will admit the Attitude Quantity is intriguing), but a) who wants to do that, and b) there&#8217;s still no ranking of results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-5680</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=348#comment-5680</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up regarding Twitter Search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up regarding Twitter Search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lano</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-5678</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=348#comment-5678</guid>
		<description>@Stakker - You&#039;re absolutely right.  Maybe I should have clarified that a bit more.  I&#039;m not trying to convey the similarities between Google and Twitter - quite the opposite really.  I&#039;m simply analyzing their differences and pointing out the benefits of each.  Sorry for the confusion. :/

@Allison - Again, I couldn&#039;t agree more.  I think the emphasis here is on the conversation not the website content.

@Ashwin - Yes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stakker &#8211; You&#8217;re absolutely right.  Maybe I should have clarified that a bit more.  I&#8217;m not trying to convey the similarities between Google and Twitter &#8211; quite the opposite really.  I&#8217;m simply analyzing their differences and pointing out the benefits of each.  Sorry for the confusion. :/</p>
<p>@Allison &#8211; Again, I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  I think the emphasis here is on the conversation not the website content.</p>
<p>@Ashwin &#8211; Yes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashwin</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlano.com/2009/03/03/search-google-vs-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-5677</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlano.com/blog/?p=348#comment-5677</guid>
		<description>Google is a great search engine when the query is for information, opinionated or not. But the information has to be a lot more generalized than about a particular episode of 24 or a movie. Twiiter search is indeed great at getting you opinions on a particular/specific thing. 

So I&#039;d consider the two complimentary rather than competitive search facilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is a great search engine when the query is for information, opinionated or not. But the information has to be a lot more generalized than about a particular episode of 24 or a movie. Twiiter search is indeed great at getting you opinions on a particular/specific thing. </p>
<p>So I&#8217;d consider the two complimentary rather than competitive search facilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

